# Bulenox vs Topstep: Budget Rithmic vs the Industry Giant (2026)
Quick Answer — Bulenox vs Topstep
- • As of April 2026, Bulenox is cheaper than Topstep on comparable accounts. The Bulenox 50K Option 1 costs $175/mo vs Topstep's $49/mo for a 50K Trading Combine (but Topstep charges a $149 activation fee to get funded).
- • Topstep uses its own proprietary platform (TopstepX) alongside Rithmic options. Bulenox is 100% Rithmic-based with NinjaTrader, Quantower, and other compatible platforms.
- • Bulenox offers trailing or EOD drawdown. Topstep uses a trailing drawdown during the Combine that converts to end-of-day on the funded Express Funded Account.
- • Topstep is the oldest and most recognized futures prop firm. Bulenox is newer, smaller, but more flexible on rules and pricing.
- • Bulenox enforces a 40% consistency rule. Topstep has its own consistency guidelines and payout ramp that limits initial withdrawal amounts.
How I compare firms: This comparison is built from actual accounts I've run at each firm — not from reading marketing pages or aggregating reviews. I've passed evals, traded funded, and dealt with support at both firms.
Bulenox stands out as a budget-friendly Rithmic option in the futures prop space. For the full breakdown, read my complete Bulenox review. For the absolute latest, check Bulenox's website or their help center.
Article Content
Bulenox and Topstep represent two extremes of the futures prop firm market. Topstep is the original, the firm that popularized the "evaluation to funded" model. They've been around the longest, have the biggest name recognition, and recently launched their own proprietary trading platform, TopstepX. Bulenox is the budget contender: lower prices, Rithmic infrastructure, and more flexibility on drawdown rules.
I've traded at both. Topstep was my entry into prop trading years ago. Bulenox came much later, and the experience felt immediately different. Less marketing polish, more raw value.
Overview: Bulenox vs Topstep at a Glance
As of April 2026, here's the full comparison. Topstep has restructured their accounts and pricing several times, so these numbers reflect the current offering.
| Category | Bulenox | Topstep | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Account Sizes | $10K-$250K (6 sizes) | $50K, $100K, $150K | 🏆 Bulenox |
| Monthly Price (50K) | $175/mo (Option 1) | $49/mo | 🏆 Topstep |
| Activation/Funded Fee | $98-$898 one-time | $149 activation fee | 🏆 Topstep |
| Drawdown Type (Eval) | Trailing (Opt 1) or EOD (Opt 2) | Trailing | 🏆 Bulenox |
| Drawdown Type (Funded) | Same as eval | EOD on Express Funded Account | 🏆 Topstep |
| Platform | Rithmic (NinjaTrader, etc.) | TopstepX + Rithmic options | Depends |
| Consistency Rule | 40% (funded) | Payout ramp + guidelines | Depends |
| Payout Split | 100% first $10K, 90/10 after | 100% first $10K, 90/10 after | Tie |
| Free Trial | 14-day free trial | No (but very cheap entry) | 🏆 Bulenox |
| Brand/Trust | Newer, growing | Industry pioneer, largest brand | 🏆 Topstep |
Pricing: Topstep Looks Cheaper, But It's Complicated
Topstep's headline pricing is aggressive. As of April 2026, the Trading Combine (evaluation) for a 50K account costs $49/month. Bulenox's 50K Option 1 is $175/month. On paper, Topstep wins by a wide margin.
But the comparison isn't that simple. Topstep charges a $149 activation fee when you pass and move to the Express Funded Account. So the total cost for a one-month pass is $198 at Topstep vs $273 at Bulenox (including the $98 activation fee).
Topstep still comes out cheaper on the 50K. But at larger account sizes, the dynamics shift. Topstep's 150K Trading Combine costs $149/month with the same $149 activation fee ($298 total for a one-month pass). Bulenox's 150K Option 1 is $345/month plus $598 activation ($943 total). Here, Topstep wins by a wide margin on total cost.
The real question is what you're getting for the money. Bulenox gives you more drawdown flexibility, more account sizes, and a free trial. Topstep gives you the cheapest entry and the biggest brand name.
Platform: TopstepX vs Rithmic
This is where these two firms diverge most. Bulenox is 100% Rithmic. You connect through NinjaTrader, Quantower, R|Trader Pro, or any Rithmic-compatible platform. The infrastructure is proven, and you bring your own charting and execution tools.
Topstep launched TopstepX, their proprietary trading platform. It's a built-from-scratch execution environment designed specifically for Topstep's accounts. You can still use Rithmic-based platforms for some Topstep account types, but Topstep is pushing traders toward TopstepX.
TopstepX has improved since launch, but opinions are mixed. Some traders love the integrated experience. Others miss the customization and reliability of NinjaTrader on Rithmic. If you've built your trading workflow around a specific Rithmic platform, Bulenox lets you keep everything unchanged. Topstep may or may not, depending on which account type you choose.
For traders who don't have a platform preference, TopstepX removes the need to buy NinjaTrader separately (which costs $60/quarter or $225/year for a lease). That's a real cost savings on top of Topstep's already lower evaluation price.
Drawdown: Bulenox Gives You the Choice Upfront
Bulenox lets you pick at signup: Option 1 (real-time trailing, no daily loss limit, full contract access) or Option 2 (EOD trailing, daily loss limit, scaling plan). Whatever you choose stays consistent from evaluation through funded.
Topstep's Trading Combine uses trailing drawdown during the evaluation. Once you pass and move to the Express Funded Account, the drawdown converts to end-of-day. You earn the EOD protection by passing the Combine, not by paying for it upfront.
If you specifically want EOD drawdown from day one, Bulenox Option 2 delivers that. If you're willing to grind through trailing during the Combine and earn EOD on the funded account, Topstep gives you a cheaper path to the same destination.
Consistency and Payout Ramp
Bulenox's 40% consistency rule is clear: no single day can exceed 40% of total profits at payout time. Simple to understand, sometimes annoying to meet.
Topstep's approach is different. They use a payout ramp that limits your initial withdrawal amounts. Your first payout request might be capped at a lower amount regardless of how much profit you've made. Subsequent payouts can be larger as you build a track record with Topstep.
The payout ramp acts as a de facto consistency mechanism without being called a consistency rule. It forces traders to demonstrate sustained profitability before making large withdrawals. Whether this is better or worse than Bulenox's 40% rule depends on your perspective. Bulenox's rule is transparent and applies equally to every payout. Topstep's ramp is progressive and rewards longevity.
Trust and Track Record
Topstep has been around since 2012. They pioneered the futures prop firm evaluation model. Their brand is the most recognized in the industry, they have thousands of Trustpilot reviews, and they've paid out more cumulative money than probably any other futures prop firm.
Bulenox is newer. The firm has grown steadily and has a solid Trustpilot profile, but the track record simply can't match a decade of operations. For risk-averse traders who want the safest bet on a firm being around next year, Topstep's history provides more confidence.
I'll say this: both firms have paid me. Both firms use real infrastructure. Neither firm has given me a reason to doubt they'll pay. But Topstep's longevity speaks for itself in an industry where firms come and go.
Who Should Pick Bulenox Over Topstep?
Bulenox is the right pick if you want more drawdown flexibility (EOD from day one), if you need account sizes below 50K or above 150K, if you want to test the firm free before paying, or if you're committed to a Rithmic-only workflow and don't want to adapt to TopstepX.
The drawdown choice is the strongest argument for Bulenox. No other firm in this comparison lets you pick your drawdown type at signup and keep it consistent through funded trading.
Who Should Pick Topstep Over Bulenox?
Topstep makes sense if low evaluation cost is your top priority, if you want the most established and recognized firm, if TopstepX appeals to you as an all-in-one platform, or if the payout ramp structure suits your withdrawal timeline better than a flat consistency rule.
Topstep's entry cost is unmatched. At $49/month for a 50K Combine, it's the cheapest way to start a prop firm evaluation in the futures space. If you're testing multiple firms and want to minimize upfront spending, Topstep is the obvious first try.
The bottom line: Topstep wins on price, brand recognition, and platform innovation with TopstepX. Bulenox wins on drawdown flexibility, account range, free trial, and staying within the pure Rithmic ecosystem. For budget-conscious first-timers, start with Topstep. For experienced traders who know exactly what drawdown type they want and value Rithmic consistency, Bulenox delivers that flexibility at a fair price.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bulenox cheaper than Topstep?
No. Topstep is generally cheaper than Bulenox for comparable account sizes. As of April 2026, Topstep's 50K Trading Combine costs $49/mo compared to Bulenox's $175/mo (Option 1). Even including Topstep's $149 activation fee, the total cost for a one-month pass is lower at Topstep.
Does Topstep use Rithmic like Bulenox?
Topstep offers both its proprietary TopstepX platform and Rithmic-based options depending on account type. Bulenox is exclusively Rithmic-based. If you want guaranteed Rithmic access with NinjaTrader and other compatible platforms, Bulenox is the safer choice.
What is TopstepX?
TopstepX is Topstep's proprietary trading platform built from scratch for their evaluation and funded accounts. TopstepX includes charting, order execution, and account management in one interface. Bulenox does not have a proprietary platform and relies entirely on Rithmic-compatible third-party platforms.
Does Topstep have a consistency rule?
Topstep doesn't use a traditional consistency rule like Bulenox's 40% threshold. Instead, Topstep uses a payout ramp that limits initial withdrawal amounts and increases over time. The ramp effectively encourages consistent performance without a hard percentage rule.
Which firm has been around longer, Bulenox or Topstep?
Topstep has been around since 2012 and is the oldest major futures prop firm. Bulenox is newer. Topstep's decade-plus track record gives it more brand trust and historical proof of paying traders, though both firms are currently operational and paying.
Can I use NinjaTrader on Topstep?
Topstep has shifted toward TopstepX for newer account types, but NinjaTrader access through Rithmic may still be available depending on which Topstep product you purchase. Bulenox supports NinjaTrader on all accounts through Rithmic without restrictions.
What drawdown type does Topstep use?
Topstep uses trailing drawdown during the Trading Combine (evaluation) and converts to end-of-day drawdown on the Express Funded Account. Bulenox lets you choose between trailing (Option 1) and end-of-day (Option 2) at signup, with the same drawdown type maintained through funded trading.
Does Bulenox offer a free trial?
Yes. Bulenox offers a 14-day free trial to test the evaluation environment before committing money. Topstep does not offer a free trial but has very low entry pricing at $49/month for the 50K Trading Combine. Both firms provide low-risk ways to get started.
What is the payout split at Bulenox vs Topstep?
Both Bulenox and Topstep offer 100% of the first $10,000 in profits with a 90/10 split after that threshold. The payout split structure is identical between the two firms.
Which firm is better for beginners, Bulenox or Topstep?
Topstep is better for beginners due to its lower monthly cost, established brand with extensive educational content, and the TopstepX platform that doesn't require purchasing separate charting software. Bulenox's free trial is valuable for testing, but the higher monthly cost makes failed evaluations more expensive for new traders.