Quick Answer β Rev One Trading vs FundingPips
- β’ Both firms offer instant funded accounts, but FundingPips also has 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step challenges for traders who prefer evaluation-based funding.
- β’ Rev One Trading charges zero commissions on Forex and Crypto. FundingPips charges standard per-lot commissions.
- β’ Rev One Trading pays weekly via GlassPay (crypto only). FundingPips pays weekly on funded accounts with traditional withdrawal options.
- β’ FundingPips offers MT5 and cTrader. Rev One Trading is locked to A-Trader exclusively.
- β’ FundingPips goes up to $300K account sizes. Rev One Trading caps at $200K for Forex and $100K for Crypto.
How I compare firms: This comparison is built from accounts I'm actively running at both firms. I look at the same factors every timeβdrawdown rules, payout speed, commission structure, and how the firm handles edge cases. No firm pays me to rank them higher.
Rev One Trading's GlassPay pool model makes direct payout comparisons trickyβit's not a fixed percentage split. For the full breakdown, read my complete Rev One Trading review. For the absolute latest, check Rev One Trading's website or their help center.
Rev One Trading and FundingPips both offer instant funded accounts, putting them in a small category of prop firms that skip the evaluation entirely. But the similarity ends at "instant funded." Their payout systems, platforms, commission structures, and account flexibility differ across the board.
I've traded accounts at both firms. FundingPips has been around since 2022 and operates out of the UAE. Rev One Trading is a Wyoming LLC that launched more recently with a unique pool-based payout model. Here's how they actually stack up.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Rev One Trading | FundingPips | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Funding Options | Instant funded only | Instant + 1-step + 2-step + 3-step | π FundingPips |
| Max Account Size | $200K Forex / $100K Crypto | $300K | π FundingPips |
| Commissions | Zero (Forex/Crypto) | Standard per-lot | π Rev One Trading |
| Profit Split | GlassPay pool (85% to traders) | 80β90% fixed | Tie |
| Payout Frequency | Weekly (Fridays) | Weekly (funded accounts) | Tie |
| Platforms | A-Trader | MT5, cTrader | π FundingPips |
| Account Types | 4 (Octane, Nitro, Static, Classic) | 4+ (multiple challenge types + instant) | π FundingPips |
| News Trading | Allowed | Allowed | Tie |
| Payout Method | Crypto only (USDT/USDC/BTC/ETH) | Multiple (bank, crypto, e-wallets) | π FundingPips |
| Consistency Rule | 30% gateway (removable) | Varies by account type | Tie |
| Instant Funded Pricing | $78β$1,568 | $119β$2,199 | π Rev One Trading |
| Founded | New firm (Wyoming LLC) | 2022 (UAE) | π FundingPips |
Instant Funding: Same Concept, Different Execution
Both firms let you pay and start trading the same day. No challenge phases, no verification. But that's where the overlap stops.
FundingPips prices its instant funded accounts from $119 to $2,199 depending on account size. Rev One Trading starts at $78 for a Nitro $5K and goes up to $1,568 for an Octane $200K Forex account. At comparable sizes, Rev One Trading is cheaper across the board.
FundingPips also gives you the option to take a challenge instead β 1-step, 2-step, or 3-step β at lower price points. If you're willing to prove yourself, you can save on the upfront cost. Rev One Trading doesn't offer that alternative. It's instant or nothing.
Winner: FundingPips β more funding options plus challenge paths for traders who want a cheaper entry point.
Commission Structure
Rev One Trading charges zero commissions on every Forex and Crypto trade. Zero. Your spread is your only trading cost.
FundingPips charges standard per-lot commissions. On Forex pairs, that's typically $3β$7 per round turn depending on the instrument. For a scalper doing 20+ trades per day, those commissions stack fast.
I ran the math on a typical month of scalping a $50K account: roughly 400 round-turn lots. At $5 average commission per lot at FundingPips, that's $2,000 in commissions alone. At Rev One Trading, it's $0. The spread might be slightly wider at Rev One Trading to compensate, but the net cost is lower for active traders.
Winner: Rev One Trading β zero commissions is a genuine edge for any trader who executes frequently.
Platform Options
FundingPips offers MT5 and cTrader. Both are industry standards with deep indicator libraries, automated trading support, and mobile apps. Your existing templates and EAs transfer directly.
Rev One Trading runs exclusively on A-Trader. It's a proprietary platform that works, but it's not MT5. Custom indicators don't port over. If you've built a workflow around MetaTrader or cTrader, switching to A-Trader means rebuilding from scratch.
For traders who don't care about specific platforms and just want to execute, A-Trader is fine. But platform flexibility is a real feature, and FundingPips has more of it.
Winner: FundingPips β MT5 and cTrader beat a single proprietary platform for most traders.
Payout System Comparison
Both firms pay weekly. Rev One Trading distributes GlassPay every Friday in crypto (USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH). FundingPips pays weekly on funded accounts with broader withdrawal options including bank transfer and e-wallets.
The structural difference is the payout calculation. FundingPips pays a fixed 80β90% of your profit. Simple math: earn $1,000, keep $800β$900. Rev One Trading's GlassPay takes 40% of firm revenue into a pool and distributes 85% of that pool to traders. Your payout depends on the pool size that week.
Rev One Trading advertises "zero payout denial" and no payout caps. FundingPips has minimum withdrawal amounts and standard processing times.
If you want predictable earnings, FundingPips makes the math easier. If you want no caps and a no-denial policy, Rev One Trading's model has appeal.
Winner: Tie β same frequency, different mechanics. Predictability (FundingPips) vs uncapped flexibility (Rev One Trading).
Pricing at Comparable Sizes
As of April 2026, here's a direct price comparison for instant funded accounts at matching sizes:
At $10K, Rev One Trading's cheapest option (Nitro) costs around $108, while FundingPips starts at $119. At $50K, Rev One Trading ranges from $278 (Nitro) to $498 (Static), while FundingPips charges $549β$799 for comparable instant accounts. At $100K, Rev One Trading ranges from $478 (Nitro) to $1,049 (Static) while FundingPips is $899β$1,499.
Rev One Trading undercuts FundingPips at every comparable size for instant funded accounts. The gap widens at larger sizes.
Winner: Rev One Trading β consistently cheaper for instant funding across all sizes.
Account Type Flexibility
Rev One Trading gives you four drawdown models: Octane (EOD trailing 3.5%), Nitro (intraday trailing 4%), Static (fixed 3%), and Classic (all-time trailing, no buffer). Each handles risk differently, and the choice significantly impacts how you trade.
FundingPips offers multiple challenge types plus its instant funded option, each with different rules. The 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step challenges all have distinct profit targets and loss limits. The instant funded option has its own rule set.
Both firms give you meaningful choice in how your account operates. Rev One Trading's four types are more distinct from each other (the drawdown model completely changes your strategy). FundingPips' variety is more about how you get funded than how the account operates after funding.
Winner: Rev One Trading β four genuinely different drawdown models give you more control over risk management.
Trust and Reputation
FundingPips launched in 2022 and has built a solid track record over three years. Based in the UAE, they've processed consistent payouts and have an active trader community. The firm offers multiple challenge paths, which shows financial stability.
Rev One Trading is newer. Registered in Wyoming as an LLC. The GlassPay model is innovative, but the firm hasn't had years to prove its reliability. Innovation is good. Unproven innovation carries risk.
Winner: FundingPips β three years of operations and payouts versus a newer firm.
Who Should Choose Rev One Trading
Choose Rev One Trading if zero commissions matter to your bottom line. Scalpers and high-frequency traders save the most here.
Rev One Trading also wins if you want the cheapest possible instant funded account. At every size, it undercuts FundingPips' instant funding pricing.
Pick Rev One Trading if you want four different drawdown models to match your specific trading style.
Who Should Choose FundingPips
FundingPips is the pick if you want platform flexibility. MT5 and cTrader support means your existing setup transfers over without rebuilding.
Choose FundingPips if you might prefer a challenge over instant funding. The 1-step and 2-step options are significantly cheaper than instant funded accounts if you can pass them.
FundingPips also wins for traders who need fiat withdrawals. Not everyone wants to get paid in crypto. Bank transfers and e-wallets are available at FundingPips but not at Rev One Trading.
The bottom line: Rev One Trading wins on commission-free trading, lower instant funding prices, and unique drawdown model flexibility. FundingPips wins on platform choice, payout method options, and the ability to take a cheaper challenge path. Active traders who want minimal costs should look at Rev One Trading. Traders who need MT5/cTrader or prefer fiat payouts should pick FundingPips.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper for instant funding β Rev One Trading or FundingPips?
Rev One Trading is cheaper at every comparable account size for instant funded accounts. At $50K, Rev One Trading's Nitro costs around $278 versus $549+ at FundingPips. The gap grows larger at bigger account sizes.
Can I use MT5 with Rev One Trading?
No. Rev One Trading uses its proprietary A-Trader platform exclusively. MT5 is not supported. FundingPips offers both MT5 and cTrader, making it the better option for traders who depend on MetaTrader-based tools and indicators.
Do both Rev One Trading and FundingPips allow news trading?
Yes. Both Rev One Trading and FundingPips allow trading during high-impact news events without restrictions. Neither firm imposes a buffer period around economic releases.
How do Rev One Trading's commissions compare to FundingPips?
Rev One Trading charges zero commissions on all Forex and Crypto trades. FundingPips charges standard per-lot commissions, typically $3β$7 per round turn. For active traders, this difference can save hundreds or thousands of dollars monthly at Rev One Trading.
Does FundingPips have a pool-based payout system like Rev One Trading?
No. FundingPips uses a traditional fixed profit split of 80β90% depending on your account type and performance. Rev One Trading's GlassPay distributes 85% of a weekly revenue pool. The two models work fundamentally differently.
Can I get paid in USD at Rev One Trading?
No. Rev One Trading pays exclusively in cryptocurrency β USDT, USDC, BTC, or ETH through GlassPay. FundingPips offers bank transfers, e-wallets, and crypto withdrawals, giving you more payout flexibility.
Which firm has larger account sizes?
FundingPips offers accounts up to $300K. Rev One Trading caps at $200K for Forex accounts and $100K for Crypto. If you need the largest possible funded account, FundingPips goes higher.
Does FundingPips offer challenges as well as instant funding?
Yes. FundingPips offers 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step challenge programs alongside its instant funded option. Challenges are cheaper upfront if you can pass them. Rev One Trading offers instant funded accounts exclusively with no challenge alternative.
Which firm has more account type variety?
Rev One Trading offers four drawdown models (Octane, Nitro, Static, Classic) that fundamentally change how your account handles risk. FundingPips offers variety through different challenge types and an instant funded option. Rev One Trading's variety is more meaningful for day-to-day trading decisions.
Is Rev One Trading or FundingPips better for scalpers?
Rev One Trading is better for scalpers because of zero commissions and the Nitro account type with 4% intraday trailing drawdown. Scalpers at FundingPips pay per-lot commissions that eat into already-thin profit margins. The commission savings alone can outweigh other differences for high-frequency strategies.