Fundingticks Review 2025: Best Futures Prop Firm 2025

What is Fundingticks? Quick Overview

Tested it. Traded with it. Cashed out. Here's the honest scoop.

When I first saw FundingTicks, I thought—oh great, another spin-off from a forex firm jumping into the futures game. And to be fair, that’s exactly what it is. But turns out, it's not half-baked.

FundingTicks is the futures-focused offshoot of FundingPips, and yeah, I know that name stirs up some mixed reactions (we’ll get into that later). But I decided to ignore the noise, fund a couple of accounts, and actually trade with them. Real CME data, real fills, and yes—real payouts. This review is based on those live experiences, not second-hand hype.

At its core, FundingTicks offers futures prop trading on CME products via Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and TradingView. Two funding routes: classic evaluation (called Pro+) and direct access via “Zero” (instant funding). High 90% profit split, fast 5-day payouts, and no consistency rule once you're funded.

Sounds clean, right? But as always, there’s fine print.

So let’s get into it.

FundingTicks Unique Features & Benefits

So here’s the thing—I’ve used dozens of prop firms. Most talk a big game about “no fluff,” “real market access,” “instant payouts.” FundingTicks actually delivers on most of it.

And that’s rare.

1. Real CME Futures Access—Not Simulated Crap

This alone sets them apart. You're trading real CME data. Not some CFD knockoff or “simulated” environment where fills get weird. That alone makes FundingTicks a solid pick for serious futures traders. No synthetic charts, no mystery slippage. You feel it when you're in a trade.

2. 90% Profit Split on Master Accounts

They’re not stingy. Once you're funded, you keep 90% of your profits. That’s top-tier in the industry. Doesn’t matter if you’re on a 25K or 300K account via their copy trading setup. You earn, they get out of your way. And after testing payouts multiple times, I can confirm—they pay. Fast.

3. No Consistency Rule After You’re Funded

A lot of firms will let you pass their challenge and then slap new restrictions on withdrawals. Not here. Once you hit the Master level, you can have a monster day and withdraw without getting flagged. That flexibility is huge if you know how to size up when the setup’s there.

4. 5-Day Payout Cycle That Actually Works

You can request a payout every 5 days, and in my experience? It lands in your account in 1–3 days. Wise, PayPal, or Plaid—smooth and drama-free. One of the fastest setups I’ve seen across any prop firm, period.

5. End-of-Day Trailing Drawdown (but… Know the Details)

They advertise “no daily drawdown,” which sounds great. And technically, it’s true. But there’s still a fixed daily loss limit on most accounts. So you can’t just ignore intraday risk. Also, the 2% max loss per trade rule isn’t very flexible. If you size up too aggressively, you're toast. So yeah—more freedom than most, but still structured risk.

6. Zero Program = Instant Funding, No Games

I was skeptical of the Zero model at first. Most “instant funding” setups are just inflated price tags wrapped in tighter risk. But here? It’s legit. You pay once, get access to a Master account immediately, and start earning rewards right away. It’s not for beginners, but for experienced traders? It’s a shortcut that makes sense.

7. Copy Trading Without the BS

You can scale to 300K via their copy trading model. And unlike firms that push you to copy random influencers, you can just copy yourself. That’s how I run it—clone my best setups, spread risk across accounts. Efficient. Smart.

Bottom line?

FundingTicks walks the talk. They didn’t just slap their logo on a futures product to ride the trend—they built something with actual trader-first decisions. It’s not perfect (some rules are still a bit hidden until you dig), but it’s damn solid.

FundingTicks Funding Options & Evaluation Process

FundingTicks gives you two lanes: slow and strategic (Pro+), or fast and direct (Zero). I’ve tested both. They serve different types of traders—and you should not just default to one without understanding the tradeoffs.

1. Pro+ Model (Evaluation-Based)

This is the typical “earn your funding” setup. You go through an evaluation (they call it the Student Stage), and if you hit the profit target without breaking the rules, you get upgraded to a Master Account with real CME access and the 90% payout split.

Let’s break it down:

Example: $25K Pro+ Account

• Cost: $99/month
• Target: $1,500
• Drawdown: $1,000 EOD trailing
• Daily Loss Cap: $1,000 (yes, even though they say “no daily DD”)
• Min. Trading Days: 3
• Contracts Allowed: 2 minis or 20 micros
• Consistency Rule: 40% during evaluation phase

What I like about this model is that once you pass, there are no more consistency rules and no more profit targets. Just stick to risk, trade your edge, get paid.

The EOD drawdown feels more forgiving compared to real-time trailing (like in some other firms), but you still need to watch that fixed daily loss and 2% per-trade cap. Break that? Account gone—even if you’re green.

⚠️ If you’re the type who goes big on one A+ setup and wants to nuke size in a single trade... you’re going to hate this model.

But if you’ve got control and patience, it’s actually one of the cleaner evaluation setups out there.

2. Zero Program (Instant Funding)

This one skips the whole challenge phase. You pay once, get a Master account from day one, and start trading for rewards immediately.

Sounds great. But here’s what you trade for that speed:

Example: $100K Zero Account

• Cost: $499 (one-time)
• Daily Loss Limit: 3%
• Max Loss: 5%
• Consistency Rule: 25% of profit cap per payout cycle
• Min. Days for Reward: 7
• Contracts: 5 minis or 50 micros

I’ve used this for scaling. It works—but only if you already know what you’re doing. The risk limits are tight. There’s no margin for sloppy entries or revenge trades. You mess up? Game over. So, no illusions here: Zero is for confident, dialed-in traders. It’s not some “easy button” for beginners.

Still—it’s a legit path if you want to skip the challenge grind and just start getting paid. I’ve pulled multiple payouts from these Zero accounts, no issues.

3. Copy Trading for Bigger Capital

One underrated feature? Scaling via copy trading. You can go up to $300K in combined funding and manage multiple accounts either by copying yourself (which I do), or copying others. The key is: you’re not locked into just one account or growth path. FundingTicks gives you structure—but it doesn’t put you in a box.

My Pick?

I like both—but for different reasons.

If I’m trying out a new strategy or easing into a swing session: Pro+.
If I’ve got an edge dialed in and I’m scaling fast: Zero.

But if you’re new or inconsistent, start with Pro+. Learn their rules. Build habits. Then go Zero when you're ready to scale or automate.

FundingTicks Rules: Drawdown, Targets & What to Watch

Here’s where things get real. Because if there’s one thing I’ve learned after testing 50+ prop firms—it’s this:

It’s not the funding. It’s the fine print.

And FundingTicks? Pretty fair overall. But you still need to read between the lines. Let’s break it down.

End-of-Day (EOD) Trailing Drawdown: A Double-Edged Sword

On paper, this sounds amazing: your drawdown only trails based on your end-of-day balance. That means your account isn’t nuked if you dip intraday and recover before the close. That’s a huge psychological edge for intraday traders—me included.

But here’s the “gotcha”:
Even though it’s EOD trailing, you still have a hard daily loss cap. For the 25K Pro+ account, that’s $1,000. Hit that intraday? You're done, even if your trailing threshold isn’t touched. So yeah—it’s not truly “no daily drawdown.” It’s just... repackaged.

Also, the 2% per-trade loss limit can sneak up on you. Trade without a stop-loss and the position goes a little sideways? You’re out—rule violation. Doesn’t matter if you recover.

Consistency Rules: Only Apply Before You're Funded

This is one of FundingTicks’ best features.

In the Pro+ evaluation? You’re capped at 40% profit from a single day. In Zero? It’s 25%. Not crazy, but it forces you to think like a real trader—not a gambler.

The minute you hit Master level though? That rule disappears.
I’ve had $2K days and withdrawn without a single issue. It’s a green flag—and shows they actually respect profitable traders.

Profit Targets: Reasonable, Not Random

Example: 25K Pro+ account has a $1,500 target to pass. That’s 6%. Totally reasonable—especially with no time pressure beyond the 3-day minimum.

But Zero accounts? Slightly different. You’re not chasing a single profit target, you’re stacking “reward cycles” that require 1% gains minimum to request a payout. Still doable, but make sure you factor that into your plan.

News Trading: Proceed with Caution

This is one of my few real gripes.

They don’t outright ban news trading—but if you make profits within 5 minutes before or after major news? They can be recalculated or denied. And they use Forex Factory as the official calendar. That means even if you weren’t trying to snipe NFP or CPI, if you open or close too close to news? They might dock it.

Honestly? I get the risk control angle. But it’s a bit fuzzy in practice, and I’ve seen others lose payout eligibility over this. So just… know the news schedule. Or trade right through it at your own risk.

Strategy Restrictions: Know What’s Off Limits

They’re strict on:

• Martingale
• Layering / aggressive DCA
• Spoofing / manipulation
• Trading without a stop
• “Rolling accounts” (stacking evals to sacrifice some)
• Wild position sizing swings

Now—most of these make sense. But layering and inconsistent sizing can get a bit gray. I’ve seen funded accounts closed for "strategy violations" even though PnL was positive. If you like to scale in heavily? Be careful. Get clarity before you run size.

Platforms & Assets: What Can You Trade with FundingTicks?

FundingTicks isn’t some jack-of-all-assets firm. You’re not gonna trade forex, crypto, or your favorite penny stock here.

They’re 100% focused on CME futures—and I actually respect that.

They didn’t dilute the platform with CFDs or some half-baked crypto feed. It’s futures. Full stop. Which means if you’re here for ES, NQ, CL or GC—you’re in the right place.

What You Can Trade: Real CME Products

• ES (E-mini S&P)
• NQ (E-mini Nasdaq)
• CL (Crude Oil)
• GC (Gold)
• Others via CME if supported on Tradovate

I’ve personally traded NQ and ES on both Pro+ and Zero accounts. Feels smooth. Real fills. No funny business. Execution matches what I see on my broker accounts.

No synthetic data feeds. No offshore pricing. That alone knocks out half the “futures” firms claiming legitimacy.

Platform Access: Tradovate, NinjaTrader & TradingView

All accounts run through Tradovate infrastructure, but you can choose your front-end:

1. Tradovate

• Their core platform.
• Clean layout, solid mobile app.
• Nano accounts available (lower fees, good for tighter budgets).
• If you want fast and native, use this.

2. NinjaTrader

• For the pros.
• More control, more customization, better analytics.
• Connects via multi-provider mode using their data.
• Slight learning curve, but I use NT8 daily—it’s rock solid once set up.

3. TradingView

• Yes, you can use it here.
• But keep in mind: TradingView calculates data differently than Ninja or Tradovate.
• You’ll see occasional price discrepancies or tiny execution lags.
• Without a paid subscription, there’s a 5-second delay—unless you use the $9.99/month Tradovate add-on.

I’ve used all three. If you’re new: start with Tradovate.
If you’re scaling or algo-testing: Ninja is your best friend.
If you live on TradingView charts? Just know the quirks.

Execution Feel: Fast, Reliable, No Weirdness

Honestly? I was impressed. Execution was crisp. No mystery fills. No slippage spikes during volume surges (yes, I tested it during open).

Also: if you use a low-latency VPS (they support QuantVPS), you can get down to 0–1ms ping time. That’s massive if you scalp or trade reaction-based setups.

FundingTicks isn’t trying to be flashy. They picked one lane—CME futures—and doubled down. If that’s your market, they’ve built a tight, efficient execution environment.

And if you don’t trade futures? This firm isn’t for you. Simple.

Payouts at FundingTicks: How They Work (and My Results)

I’ll cut to it: I’ve gotten multiple payouts from FundingTicks.
Fast. No drama. No “verification cycles.” No vague hold-ups.
It just… worked.

And honestly? That puts them in the top tier for me.

Here’s the Payout Structure (Simple, Effective):

• 90% profit split on all Master accounts
• Request payouts every 5 days
• Minimum reward thresholds apply (based on 1% of account size)
• Payout methods: Plaid (US), Wise or PayPal (international)
• Typical processing time:
  • Plaid: Instant
  • Wise/PayPal: Under 12 business hours (my experience: more like 2–6 hours)

That 5-day payout cycle might sound fast—and it is.

So yeah, you can technically withdraw every 5 days, but you still need to hit that 1% gain mark first. If you’re trading small or taking it slow, that might stretch the payout window. Just something to keep in mind for cash flow planning.

Real-World Experience? Zero Issues

I’ve withdrawn 4 times across two accounts (Pro+ and Zero). All payouts hit fast. No follow-up emails. No back-and-forth. The portal told me what to expect, and that’s exactly what happened.

Bonus points for:

• Transparent fees (not hidden inside the payout)
• Real exchange rates (not mystery FX conversions)
• No extra hoops after KYC is done once

Compare that to firms that ghost you or take 10 business days—and yeah, this feels premium.

One Word of Caution: News Profits Can Be Denied

If you trade around news events and generate profits within their 5-min window (before or after), they can adjust or reject those earnings.

They use Forex Factory as the clock. And no, they’re not flexible on it.

So if you’re scalping NQ during FOMC, or trying to ride crude oil inventory spikes—be sharp. Even if your trade is clean, if it overlaps with the restricted zone, your payout could take a hit. Not shady, just strict.

They pay. Fast. Clean. No BS.

‍Just don’t get lazy about the news rules or minimum reward limits. Nail those, and this is one of the smoothest payout processes I’ve tested—especially for futures traders.

Final Verdict: Is FundingTicks Worth It in 2025?

Yeah. It is.

I’ve tested over 50+ prop firms. Most of them blur together—same marketing, same CFD backend, same payout excuses.

FundingTicks actually stands out. And not because they hype themselves. It’s because once you trade with them, you notice the difference.

✅ Real CME access.
✅ Consistent execution.
✅ Transparent rules (mostly).
✅ 90% payouts that hit fast.
✅ No payout consistency rule once funded.
✅ Both eval and instant options that actually make sense.

It’s not perfect, of course. No firm is.

There are a few quirks:

• The “no daily drawdown” claim is a bit of a stretch when you realize the fixed daily loss cap still exists.
• The 2% per-trade risk cap is strict—and can trip up anyone who doesn't use a hard stop.
• News trading rules are tighter than most realize. And yes, they will recalculate profits if you’re sloppy around events.
• And sure, they’re part of the FundingPips family, which carries baggage. But my actual experience with FundingTicks has been solid—way cleaner than the parent’s rep on Reddit.

Who It’s For:

• Futures traders who want real market access, not fake data feeds.
• Traders who value clear funding paths, both eval and instant.
• Anyone who’s passed a few challenges already and wants to scale with high payouts + clean execution.
• People who don’t want to babysit a Discord mod to chase their money.

Who Should Skip:

• Newbies still breaking risk rules every week—this firm isn’t training wheels.
• High-risk gamblers who want to size big and swing for 10R—those 2% caps will eat you.
• Anyone relying on news-based scalping—the restrictions will kill your edge.

My Personal Take?

I still actively trade with FundingTicks.
I’ve scaled accounts. I’ve withdrawn multiple payouts.
It’s one of the top 3 prop firms on my dashboard right now—and that’s saying something.

They’re not perfect. But they’re real. And in 2025, that’s a rare thing.

‍