Home Compare FundingPips vs Bulenox
FundingPips logo
FundingPips
20% OFF
⚔ Head-to-Head Updated 2026-05-22 · Both firms reviewed by Paul

FundingPips vs Bulenox (2026)

Side-by-side: drawdown, payouts, pricing, platforms. FundingPips uses Static, Bulenox uses EOD-trailing (no lock) — these are different beasts.

Quick verdict
Entry price
FundingPips
Drawdown protection
Tie
Paul-tested
Both
Profit split
Toss-up
Plans on offer
FundingPips

Side-by-Side Specs

Dimension FundingPips Bulenox
Drawdown mechanicStaticEOD-trailing (no lock)
Cheapest eval$29$87
Profit splitUp to 95%90%
Payout frequencyWeeklyWeekly
Max funding$2,000,000$2,750,000
Max payout
AssetsForex, Metals, Indices, Energies, CryptoFutures
PlatformsMT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLockerRithmic R|TRADER, NinjaTrader 8, Tiger Trade, Optimus Flow
Payout methodsBank wire, Visa Direct, Mastercard, Crypto, RiseworksACH, Wire Transfer, PayPal, Wise
Promo codeVIBES (20% off)VIBES (45% off)
Paul-testedYesYes

Drawdown — The Single Most Important Difference

FundingPips uses Static while Bulenox uses EOD-trailing (no lock). Your risk approach needs to adjust when switching.

FundingPips

Static

Fixed-dollar MLL below starting balance. Never moves. Simplest mental model.

Bulenox

EOD-trailing (no lock)

MLL trails end-of-day equity-high with no lock. Pure trailing-up.

Account Plans Compared

FundingPips offers 11 plans. Bulenox offers 4 plans.

FundingPips plans

  • 2-Step Standard $5K
    Starting $5,000 · $36
  • 2-Step Standard $10K
    Starting $10,000 · $66
  • 2-Step Standard $25K
    Starting $25,000 · $156
  • 2-Step Standard $50K
    Starting $50,000 · $289
  • 2-Step Standard $100K
    Starting $100,000 · $529
  • 2-Step Pro $5K
    Starting $5,000 · $29

Bulenox plans

  • Option 1 $50K
    Starting $50,000 · $145 · 8d cycle
  • Option 2 $50K
    Starting $50,000 · $175 · 8d cycle
  • Option 1 $100K
    Starting $100,000 · $195 · 8d cycle
  • Option 2 $100K
    Starting $100,000 · $245 · 8d cycle

Who Fits Which Firm

→ Pick FundingPips if

  • You want a Static mechanic
  • Entry price matters — $29 beats $87
  • You value firms personally tested with documented payouts
  • Your strategy fits this firm's drawdown profile

→ Pick Bulenox if

  • You want a EOD-trailing (no lock) mechanic
  • You trade Futures — broader asset coverage
  • You want to diversify firm-risk alongside FundingPips

FAQ — FundingPips vs Bulenox

Is FundingPips or Bulenox cheaper to start?

FundingPips's cheapest evaluation is $29. Bulenox's cheapest is $87. FundingPips wins on entry price by $58.

What's the drawdown difference between FundingPips and Bulenox?

FundingPips uses Static. Bulenox uses EOD-trailing (no lock). These are fundamentally different — your risk model needs to change when switching between them.

Which firm has the better profit split?

FundingPips: Up to 95%. Bulenox: 90%.

Has Paul personally tested both firms?

Yes for FundingPips — documented payouts on the main review page. Bulenox also Paul-tested with documented payouts.

Can I run both FundingPips and Bulenox accounts simultaneously?

Yes. Different prop firms have no shared compliance — running them in parallel is the standard playbook for funded traders looking to diversify firm-risk. Track each firm's rule changes independently.

Which firm pays out faster?

FundingPips payout cadence: Weekly. Bulenox: Weekly. Method matters too — Wise and Plaid typically beat ACH and wire by 1-2 days.

Are there overlap restrictions if I trade both?

No cross-firm compliance overlap. Each firm 1099s independently for US residents. Cross-firm copy-trading rules only matter inside a single firm's account family.

If I had to pick one, what's the deciding factor?

Drawdown mechanic comes first. Both firms run trailing mechanics — winners decide on entry price and payout speed. After mechanic, evaluate payout speed and your strategy's drawdown profile.