MyFundedFutures Consistency Rule: 30% and 50% Calculator

The MyFundedFutures consistency rule limits your best day's profit as a percentage of total profit in the relevant evaluation or payout cycle. Standard Rapid and Pro evaluations use 50%, Rapid EOD evaluation uses 30%, and Builder simulated funded payout cycles use 50% even though Builder evaluations have no consistency rule.

Updated August 6, 2026. MyFundedFutures has several plan-specific versions of consistency. Always match the calculation to the plan and stage shown in your dashboard.

How does the MyFundedFutures consistency formula work?

Divide the profit from your best trading day by total profit for the applicable evaluation or payout cycle:

Consistency percentage = best-day profit ÷ total profit × 100

You satisfy the rule when the result is at or below the plan's threshold. A loss day can reduce total profit and push the percentage higher even though the best-day dollar amount has not changed. The MyFundedFutures rules overview shows where consistency sits beside drawdown, trading-day, and news requirements.

Which plans use 50% consistency?

Standard Rapid evaluations and standard Pro evaluations use a 50% best-day threshold. Builder 25 and Builder 50 use 50% during simulated funded payout cycles, not during their evaluations.

The same percentage does not mean the same measurement period. Rapid and Pro use total evaluation profit, while Builder uses profit within the current payout cycle. Check the account types guide before applying a calculation to a similarly sized but different plan.

Which plan uses 30% consistency?

Rapid EOD evaluation uses the 30% rule. Its best profitable day must be no more than 30% of total evaluation profit.

That is materially stricter than 50%. A $1,000 best day needs at least $3,333.34 in total profit under a 30% threshold, compared with $2,000 under a 50% threshold. The dedicated Rapid EOD guide covers its 50K evaluation, four minimum trading days, and end-of-day drawdown structure.

Which plans have no evaluation consistency rule?

Builder 25 and Builder 50 evaluations have no consistency rule. The Pro 50K One-Day add-on also has no consistency rule. Those exceptions should not be expanded to other versions of Pro or to the Builder payout stage.

Standard Rapid and Pro evaluations still use 50%, and Rapid EOD evaluation still uses 30%. The MyFundedFutures pricing page separates current products and add-ons so that a fee label is not mistaken for a rule set.

How can you calculate the extra profit required?

Use the applicable decimal threshold to calculate the minimum total profit supported by your current best day:

Required total profit = best-day profit ÷ threshold

Then subtract current total profit:

Extra profit needed = max(0, required total profit − current total profit)

For a 50% rule, use 0.50. For a 30% rule, use 0.30. The result is the additional net profit needed if the best day does not increase. New trading can create a larger best day, so recalculate after every session.

What is an exact 50% consistency example?

Assume a standard Rapid evaluation has $2,400 in total profit and the best day produced $1,400.

$1,400 ÷ $2,400 × 100 = 58.33%

The account is above the 50% threshold. Required total profit is:

$1,400 ÷ 0.50 = $2,800

Extra profit needed is:

$2,800 − $2,400 = $400

If the trader earns another $400 without creating a best day above $1,400, total profit becomes $2,800 and consistency becomes exactly 50%. Standard Rapid objectives and stage changes are detailed in the Rapid plan guide.

What is an exact 30% consistency example?

Assume a Rapid EOD evaluation has $3,000 in total profit and a $1,200 best day.

$1,200 ÷ $3,000 × 100 = 40%

The account is above the 30% threshold. Required total profit is:

$1,200 ÷ 0.30 = $4,000

Extra profit needed is:

$4,000 − $3,000 = $1,000

If the next sessions add $1,000 without producing a day above $1,200, total profit becomes $4,000 and consistency becomes exactly 30%.

What happens when a loss reduces total profit?

A loss makes the ratio worse because the denominator falls. Suppose a Pro evaluation has a $900 best day and $1,800 total profit. The ratio is exactly 50%. If the account then loses $300, total profit falls to $1,500:

$900 ÷ $1,500 × 100 = 60%

The best day did not change, but the account is no longer consistent. It now needs total profit of $900 ÷ 0.50 = $1,800, or $300 more, provided no new day exceeds $900.

Does hitting the profit target guarantee a pass?

No. Reaching the nominal target does not guarantee that the consistency condition is satisfied. A standard 50K Rapid evaluation has a $3,000 profit target. If one day generated $1,800, the ratio at exactly $3,000 is 60%.

That trader needs at least $1,800 ÷ 0.50 = $3,600 in total profit to reach 50%, assuming the best day remains $1,800. Profit target, minimum trading days, drawdown, and consistency must all be satisfied under the relevant plan.

Can a large final day delay a pass?

Yes. A final-day gain can reach the nominal target while creating a new best day that lifts the consistency ratio above the limit. The solution is not to give back profit deliberately. It is to add compliant profit over later sessions while protecting the account's loss limit.

Position size matters here. The position limits guide explains the maximum permitted exposure, but trading at that maximum can create a best day that is difficult to balance. A legal contract size is not necessarily a sensible consistency size.

How does consistency work on standard Rapid?

Standard Rapid evaluation uses a 50% best-day rule across 25K, 50K, 100K, and 150K sizes. The evaluation also requires at least two trading days. Passing requires the target, drawdown, minimum-day, and consistency conditions to align.

The standard Rapid simulated funded stage has no consistency rule in the supplied rules. It instead uses intraday trailing drawdown, a $100 lock, no daily loss limit, and Tier 1 news restrictions. Do not carry the evaluation's 50% calculation into that stage unless the firm changes the funded guide.

How does consistency work on standard Pro?

Standard Pro evaluation uses 50% consistency for the 50K, 100K, and 150K sizes. The normal evaluations require at least two trading days. The Pro 50K One-Day add-on is different: it has a $4,000 target, permits passing in one day, and has no consistency rule.

Pro simulated funded rules do not apply a consistency condition in the supplied guide. Payout eligibility is a separate subject, so use the payout rules article before assuming that the absence of consistency means an immediate request is available.

How does consistency work on Builder?

Builder 25 and Builder 50 evaluations have no consistency rule and can be passed in one trading day if all other requirements are met. Once in the simulated funded stage, each payout cycle uses a 50% best-day rule.

The Builder measurement resets after an approved payout. The next cycle starts a new best-day and total-profit comparison. A denied, pending, or not-yet-approved request should not be treated as a reset unless the account record shows the new cycle.

What is a Builder payout-cycle example?

Assume a Builder simulated funded account has earned $1,600 during the current payout cycle, with $1,000 coming on the best day.

$1,000 ÷ $1,600 × 100 = 62.5%

At a 50% threshold, required cycle profit is $1,000 ÷ 0.50 = $2,000. The trader needs $400 more in that cycle without creating a best day above $1,000. Other Builder payout conditions still apply. The MyFundedFutures payout rules covers buffers, minimum requests, caps, and cycle limits.

Does news trading change the consistency calculation?

The formula does not change during a news event, but a large release-driven gain can become the best day and raise the required total profit. A trade can also violate a news restriction even if its profit later fits the consistency percentage.

Use the news trading policy guide for the plan and stage distinction. MyFundedFutures' generic news wording conflicts with some plan guides, so consistency compliance is never a substitute for checking release eligibility.

Can a coupon remove the consistency rule?

No. A coupon or promotional price does not change the 30% or 50% threshold attached to the purchased product. Only the specific plan version and add-ons determine whether consistency applies.

The discount code guide covers offer volatility and checkout verification. It should be used for price context, not as evidence of a rule waiver.

Does country eligibility affect the percentage?

No. The consistency threshold is not adjusted by residence or travel location. Country eligibility controls purchase, reset, and travel access, while consistency controls profit distribution in an evaluation or payout cycle.

Check the restricted countries list before buying or resetting from another country. Passing the numerical rule does not override a location restriction.

How should you manage consistency without gaming it?

Choose a repeatable daily risk amount, calculate the ratio after each session, and reduce size before one day becomes disproportionately large. Do not create offsetting or coordinated trades to manufacture a smoother record. Hedging the same underlying and collaborating across unrelated accounts are prohibited.

The calculation is descriptive, not a target for artificial losses. Keep valid profit, trade your regular system, and add only risk that fits the drawdown and contract limits. For a broader decision on whether the rules suit your process, read the full MyFundedFutures review.

Track the best day and total profit in the same measurement period. Mixing lifetime account profit with one Builder payout cycle, or mixing evaluation results with simulated funded results, produces the wrong percentage even when the arithmetic is correct.

The bottom line

Use 50% for standard Rapid and Pro evaluations, 30% for Rapid EOD evaluation, and 50% for each Builder simulated funded payout cycle. Builder evaluations and the Pro 50K One-Day add-on have no consistency rule. Divide best-day profit by total profit, then compare the result with the correct threshold. Recalculate after every session because both gains and losses can change the ratio.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MyFundedFutures consistency rule?

It limits the best trading day's profit to a stated percentage of total profit for the relevant evaluation or payout cycle.

What is the consistency rule for standard Rapid evaluations?

The best day must be no more than 50% of total evaluation profit.

What is the consistency rule for Pro evaluations?

Standard Pro evaluations use a 50% best-day consistency rule.

What is the Rapid EOD consistency rule?

Rapid EOD evaluation uses a 30% best-day consistency rule.

Do Builder evaluations have a consistency rule?

No. Builder 25 and Builder 50 evaluations do not have a consistency rule.

Do Builder simulated funded accounts have consistency?

Yes. Each Builder payout cycle uses a 50% best-day consistency rule, which resets after an approved payout.

How do I calculate my consistency percentage?

Divide your best day's profit by your total profit for the applicable evaluation or payout cycle, then multiply by 100.

How much more profit do I need to meet consistency?

Divide the best-day profit by the applicable threshold, then subtract current total profit. If the result is negative, no extra profit is required for consistency.

Does standard Rapid simulated funded trading have a consistency rule?

No. The supplied standard Rapid simulated funded rules do not apply a consistency requirement.

Does the Pro One-Day add-on use consistency?

No. The Pro 50K One-Day add-on has no consistency rule.