Table of contents
Table of contents
Micro futures use smaller contract multipliers than the related E-mini or standard contracts. That can make it easier to adjust a position in smaller increments. It does not make a trade safe by itself: losses still depend on the instrument, the distance to your exit, the number of contracts, slippage, and fees.
For the five CME products compared here, the contract multiplier and minimum price increment determine the dollar value of a tick. Check those values before calculating size. If you trade through a prop firm, check its rules separately: exchange specifications do not tell you whether your account type permits a product, how many contracts count against its limit, or how its drawdown works.
This guide focuses on MES, MNQ, MYM, MGC, and MCL. CME lists other micro-sized contracts, and product availability can change. The table is not a complete list of every smaller-sized futures contract.
Five commonly traded micro contracts
| Symbol | Product | Contract multiplier | Minimum price move | Value of one tick | Related standard contract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MES | Micro E-mini S&P 500 | $5 × S&P 500 index | 0.25 index points | $1.25 | ES ($50 × index) |
| MNQ | Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 | $2 × Nasdaq-100 index | 0.25 index points | $0.50 | NQ ($20 × index) |
| MYM | Micro E-mini Dow | $0.50 × DJIA index | 1 index point | $0.50 | YM ($5 × index) |
| MGC | Micro Gold | 10 troy ounces | $0.10 per ounce | $1.00 | GC (100 troy ounces) |
| MCL | Micro WTI Crude Oil | 100 barrels | $0.01 per barrel | $1.00 | CL (1,000 barrels) |
The equity-index contract multipliers and tick values come from CME Group's Micro E-mini specifications and its Micro E-mini FAQ. CME lists MGC as a 10-ounce contract with a $1 value for a $0.10 tick in its Micro Gold overview. Its Micro WTI fact card specifies 100 barrels and $1 per $0.01 tick for MCL. Checked October 12, 2026.
Tick value is the dollar change for one minimum price movement on one contract. For MES, for example, a 0.25-point move multiplied by $5 per index point equals $1.25 per tick. A 4-point move is 16 ticks, or $20 per MES contract before fees and slippage.
The contract multipliers of MES, MNQ, and MYM are one tenth of their E-mini counterparts. MGC is one tenth of standard 100-ounce Gold, and MCL is one tenth of standard 1,000-barrel WTI. Ten same-direction micro contracts therefore have the same multiplier-based exposure as one related standard contract. That comparison excludes fees, slippage, liquidity, and any difference in the contract month.
Notional value changes with the underlying price. Margin also changes and depends on the broker or trading program. Neither belongs in a fixed specifications table unless its source and date are stated.
Calculate position risk from the stop
Start with a dollar risk limit for the trade. Then calculate the price risk for one contract:
Price risk per contract = stop distance in ticks × tick value
Theoretical contract count = trade risk budget ÷ price risk per contract
Round down to a whole contract. Then account for commissions, exchange and clearing fees, and possible slippage. A stop order does not guarantee an exit at the stop price, especially during a fast market or a gap.
Hypothetical MES example
Assume a trader sets a $200 maximum price risk for a hypothetical trade and places the stop 8 index points from entry. MES moves in 0.25-point ticks, so the stop is 32 ticks away. At $1.25 per tick, the planned price risk is $40 per contract. The arithmetic gives a maximum of five contracts before fees and slippage:
`$200 ÷ (8 points ÷ 0.25 points per tick × $1.25) = 5 MES`
This is a worked calculation, not a recommended risk level or a prediction of the loss. If the $200 budget must also cover costs or execution risk, the usable contract count is lower. Apply the same method to another product using its current tick size and tick value.
For a prop account, a nominal account label such as “50K” is not the same as the amount available to lose. Work from the account's actual remaining drawdown buffer and your own risk limit. A product's smaller tick value can help you size more finely, but it does not change the account's loss rules.
For a broader introduction to futures, see what E-mini futures are. The sizing formula above applies to any contract once you have verified its current tick size and tick value.
Check the prop firm's rules for your exact account
Do not assume that a firm-wide statement applies to every evaluation, simulated funded, or live account. Before placing an order, find the current rules for your specific product and account type. Record the page or terms you checked and the date.
Verify:
- Whether the exact symbol is allowed on your platform and account phase.
- How the firm counts micro contracts against its maximum position size. A limit stated in “contracts” may count each micro as one contract; another program may define a separate micro limit.
- The drawdown type and when its threshold moves. Distinguish when the threshold is calculated from when a breach is enforced, and check whether a threshold can lock.
- Any daily loss limit, scaling plan, news restriction, time restriction, or flattening requirement that applies to the account.
- Which commissions and other trading costs the program deducts, and whether its displayed balance includes them.
- The contract's expiry and settlement process, plus the firm's deadline for closing or rolling a position.
Use the firm's current rulebook or help center for that account, not a general comparison article or an old screenshot. If the rules do not clearly answer whether a micro symbol is allowed or how it counts, ask the firm before relying on it.
Micro and standard contracts are not interchangeable in every respect
The smaller multiplier changes dollar exposure per point, not the underlying market's price chart. For example, MES and ES follow the S&P 500 futures market, but each contract's dollar value per point differs. Ten MES have the same multiplier-based exposure as one ES; order count, fees, fills, and execution can still differ.
The same distinction matters when comparing other products. MNQ tracks the Nasdaq-100, while MES tracks the S&P 500 and MYM tracks the Dow. They are different indexes and will not produce identical price paths. MGC and MCL track different commodity markets, with their own contract months and settlement terms. Choose a product because it fits the market and plan you have studied, not because its tick value looks small.
Micro products can also have different liquidity and spreads from their standard counterparts. Conditions vary by contract month and time of day. Check the live order book and the costs on your own platform instead of assuming that the smaller contract has the same execution quality.
Fees can change a micro-versus-standard comparison
For the same multiplier-based exposure, a position in ten micro contracts may incur a per-contract commission ten times over, while one standard contract incurs it once. The exact comparison depends on the program's fee schedule and any exchange, clearing, routing, or platform charges. Include both entry and exit costs.
Estimate the round-trip cost before comparing two position sizes:
`contracts × round-trip cost per contract`
Then add the cost of the spread and any slippage observed in the market and account you use. Avoid a fixed “typical margin” or commission figure unless it comes from the current provider terms for the exact setup.
Expiry and settlement still matter
Micro contracts have their own contract months and expiry dates. Do not assume that the micro and standard contract you see in a platform's symbol picker have the same last trading time or settlement process. CME describes MCL as financially settled and listed monthly; its product card notes that it expires the day before the standard WTI contract. CME's Micro E-mini fact card lists the equity-index products' expiration details. MGC has a delivery process described in CME's contract notice.
Follow both the exchange contract calendar and your prop firm's closeout rules. If you are unsure about expiry, delivery, or the firm's deadline, do not carry the position into that period. For contract-month changes, see how futures contract rollover works.
Common questions
Do micro futures automatically reduce risk?
No. A smaller tick value makes smaller position increments possible. A trader can still take excessive risk by increasing the number of contracts, using a wide stop, or ignoring the account's loss limit. Calculate the planned loss for the whole position, then include costs and execution uncertainty.
Can I trade micro futures in a prop firm evaluation?
That depends on the exact firm, platform, product, account type, and evaluation phase. Check the firm's current rules for the symbol and contract limit before trading. Exchange listing alone does not establish that a prop program permits a contract.
Is one micro contract always one tenth of a standard contract?
No universal rule follows from the word “micro.” In this guide, the five named products have a one-tenth multiplier relationship to their corresponding standard contracts. Check the official specification for any other product; CME and other exchanges list smaller contracts with different relationships and terms.
Sources and maintenance
Contract specifications in this guide are owned by the exchange. Recheck them when CME changes a contract specification or listing. Prop-firm permissions, contract limits, drawdown mechanics, and fees are owned by each firm's current terms and must be checked for the exact program and account phase before a decision. Exchange specifications do not establish what a prop firm permits.
Evidence checked: CME Group product specifications and product notices, October 12, 2026. The position-sizing example is derived from the stated tick values and labeled assumptions. No firm-specific permissions, margin figures, or fee amounts are presented as current facts.