Wishlists

✓More than 30 payout cycles completed in my own LucidFlex and LucidPro accounts

✗Lucid launched in 2025 and has a shorter operating history than the oldest futures firms

✓My FX/CFD record spans about three years, multiple passed challenges including Stellar routes and 10+ payouts

✗Separate CFD and Futures systems create more rule and platform complexity

✓My Futures record covers every account type, many passed evaluations, 23 completed payouts and three current funded 50K Growth accounts.

✗The EOD drawdown floor is enforced in real time, so touching it intraday is still a hard breach.

✓Four distinct current routes: Rapid, Pro, Builder and limited-time Rapid EOD

✗Rule details vary sharply by plan and by evaluation, sim-funded and Live stage

✓90 percent profit split on every program in the sim stage, no tiered ramp

✗Consistency rule is a trap for new traders, Ignite's 15% and the 40% rules on Elite Daily (evaluation) and Elite Access (funded) all catch traders who didn't plan P&L distribution from day one

✓About four years of first-hand CFD experience with recurring payouts

✗FTMO Futures remains research-only in my personal record

✓My record covers 12 completed payouts across 2025 and 2026

✗Straight to Funded has a material five-versus-seven payout-day conflict

✓Four genuinely different routes spanning standard EOD evaluation, fast evaluation and instant funding.

✗Payout requests are limited to two monthly windows and carry a disclosed 2% processing fee.

✓Longest continuous operating record in retail futures prop, founded 2012

✗Trustpilot 3.6/5 across 14,532 reviews (checked August 2, 2026) reflects years of operating volume rather than poor service, but the rating is lower than newer peers

✓My own multi-year use, three current PRO accounts and prior withdrawal experience

✗PRO intraday trail is materially harder than the Test drawdown

✓Three current programs with a choice between intraday and end-of-day funded drawdown

✗Quick Pay EOD changes to intraday trailing drawdown in Funded Sim

✓My first-hand Apex record spans more than two years and up to ten legacy 50K PAs

✗My personal record does not cover a current EOD or Intraday PA payout cycle

✓My first-hand record includes four completed payout cycles through Rise

✗Help Center language lags the current Standard and Lite checkout structure

✓Exact first-party owners publish program-specific rules and scaling.

✗The Terms use a dual-entity operator structure across UK and Israeli companies.

✓Five ways in: four evaluation models (1 Step Flex, 2 Step Standard, 2 Step Flex, 2 Step Pro) plus Zero, which starts as a Master Account with no evaluation

✗The reward cycle, and with it your split, is set once before your first trade and locks permanently

✓One brand covers current Futures and CFD paths

✗I have not personally tested an account or payout

✓PTV has a first-hand record of 12 evaluations, 9 passes and two paid payout cycles

✗Final prices and temporary promotions remain checkout-sensitive.

✓Support has been excellent during setup and the active account test.

✗The 50K One Step payout path requires a permanent $2,000 profit buffer.

✓Three clearly differentiated entry paths rather than one forced evaluation model.

✗Rule details differ by path and stage; generic Bulenox summaries are easy to misapply.

✓Four current product families cover Forex, Crypto and Futures.

✗Rules cannot be transferred safely between products, markets or stages.

✓One-time evaluation pricing with no published activation fee

✗My personal test belongs to earlier products rather than the complete current lineup

✓Four dedicated product pages publish distinct risk structures.

✗Regional availability and checkout configuration differ across the current named product catalog.

✓Two static-drawdown two-step choices and one one-step route are documented separately.

✗All evaluation stages require five trading days.

✓Current standard cards advertise a 90/10 trader split and daily payout requests

✗Pro uses intraday trailing drawdown

✓Four current account families cover evaluation, fast-path and instant-funded preferences

✗I have not traded FuturesElite or completed a withdrawal here

✓The official library documents multiple evaluation and instant-style routes.

✗The Help Center collection is not a reliable current-purchase inventory on its own.

✓Crypto-native workflow across Bybit Demo, Tealstreet and CLEO

✗My four-account test produced zero payouts